Case-Shiller: Denver No. 5 in December Market

February 24, 2010 by Mimi Miller.

Case-Shiller: Denver No. 5 in December
By John Rebchook, on February 23rd, 2010
Month 1-Year Change Rank
January -5.1% 2
February -5.7% 2
March -5.5% 1
April -4.9% 1
May -4.6% 4
June -3.6% 3
July -2.9% 3
August -1.2% 2
September -1.2% 1
October -0.1% 1
November 0.5% 3
December 1.25 5

Source: Standard & Poor’s and Fiserv for 2009

The Denver metro’s housing market ended last year with a 1.2 percent year-over-year gain, the best showing in 2009, according to the closely watched S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices released today.

However, the one-year change in December was good for only fifth place of the 20 cities tracked in the index, as other cities also showed even larger one-year gains in December. San Francisco was No. 1 with a 4.8 percent gain. Dallas, San Diego, and Washington, D.C., also showed larger gains than Denver. Las Vegas, by contrast, showed a 20.6 percent one-year drop.

Still, some local real estate officials said the jump is a good sign that the Denver housing market is on the road to recovery. It was only the second time that Denver was in positive territory in 2009 from the same month in 2008. In November, the one-year change was 0.5%.

“Wow, that is huge,” said Mike Rinner, of the Genesis Group, which tracks housing along the Front Range. “I just stood in front of a crowd of 140 this morning and told them according to Case-Shiller we were up 0.5 percent and I expected that we would end the year at about zero. Boy, was I wrong.”

The Case-Shiller analyzes data from the same homes that have been re-sold, so it eliminates a bias of different homes in the sales mix, which can drive the average and median prices of homes up or down. For example, there have been so many distressed homes sold in Denver in recent years, that it drove the overall market down, while in more normal years, bigger homes entered the market, driving prices up.

What the Case-Shiller study reflects the “healing” of prices at the lower-end, Rinner said.

“The greatest volume of home sales are occurring at the lower end,” Rinner said. “The values have been re-set as lower-end foreclosed homes hit the market, and there has been some appreciation from the lowest levels. If you look at the worst foreclosure markets in Adams, Denver and in Arapahoe counties, those markets have healed. Areas along the northeast corridor such as Green Valley Ranch and Montbello used to have the largest supply of unsold homes on the market, but now they have among the lowest,” as investors and owner-occupants have snapped them up at bargain prices.

By contrast, Rinner said not many sales are occurring in the higher price ranges and there is arguably a large over-supply of expensive homes on the market today.

But because of Case-Shiller’s methodology, it does not include the spec home constructed by a builder for $1.2 million, which never sold and is now going through the foreclosure process and likely will eventually be sold for $400,000 or $500,000, Rinner said.

“Also, at the upper end, owners are less inclined to take a hit, so they won’t sell it in today’s market if they don’t have to,” Rinner said. “So they are just sitting there until the market improves.”

Rinner said that Denver’s drop in the ranking is not a concern. Because areas such as San Francisco have had such huge drops in the past, he said it is not a surprise that they may jump as they start emerging from the bottom.

Independent broker Gary Bauer said that the Case-Shiller showing reflects the price gains that have occurred in the Denver area during the past six months.

“It’s been a nice, steady upward movement,” Bauer said. “From my perspective, we were the first coming into it, and we will be the first coming out.”

But Bauer said he is a ”little surprised that we dropped in the ranking. I didn’t realize that San Francisco is starting its recovery.”

Indeed, he is consulting with a person who three years ago bought a house outside of San Francisco for about $650,000. The owner then put another $300,000 into it. Now, he would like to sell it and move to the Dallas area to be closer to family.

But it’s not worth anything close to $1 million.

“Unfortunately, he bought at the wrong time of the real estate cycle,” Bauer said. “It’s worth maybe $650,000, max. I really don’t know what he can do other than just wait.”

Meanwhile, Bauer is working with a first-time buyer who hopes to take advantage of the $8,000 federal tax credit, which requires that the house is placed under contract by April 30.

“It’s a condo in northeast Aurora that the original owner bought for $143,000,” Bauer said. “We have it under contract for $90,000.”

But John P. Cochran, the Dean of the School of Business at Metropolitan State College of Denver, wonders if the tax credit for first-time buyers, which was extended in early November, may have skewed the numbers late last year.

“It’s hard for me, right now, to accurately interpret the numbers of November and December,” Cochran said. “People were uncertain whether the $8,000 tax credit was going to be extended, so there may have been some acceleration going on as we moved closer to that date when it might have expired. I’m guessing that may have caused a one-time bump.”

John Skrabec, the broker-owner of Live Urban Real Estate, said he thinks that the tax credit, which now requires a buyer to place a home under contract by April 30, did help the market late last year. Qualified current owners also have a $6,500 tax credit. The homes must be closed by the end of June to get the credits.

“I think that sales might be front-loaded to the first part of this year, because of the credits,” Skrabec said. “I am a little nervous about what is going to happen after they are gone.”

Still, he said the gain in the Case-Shiller report is an “encouraging sign.”

And he said it doesn’t bother him that some other markets jumped past Denver, although he was surprised that cities such as San Francisco and San Diego saw such big percentage gains.

“I think that is just the pattern that Denver has echoed over time,” Skrabec said. ‘We don’t usually have the biggest drops, but we don’t have the biggest increases, either. Our little chart doesn’t go up and down as some other cities.”

Also, he said that certain neighborhoods have shown much greater appreciation, from the bottom of the market, than the 1.2 percent overall gain reflects.

“Prices have gone up a lot in southwest Denver, in neighborhoods like Ruby Hill and Athmar Park,” Skrabec said. “They were beaten up pretty bad, and there has been a lot of investors fixing and flipping homes there. Prices have been going up. Most of the demand has been from the bottom up, and that’s all right. The market is gong to recover from the bottom up, not from the top down.”

And even higher-priced homes are moving in northwest Denver neighborhoods such as West Highland and Berkeley, he said. Neighborhoods such as City Park and Uptown, also are doing well. “But it’s still pretty tough outside of the city neighborhoods in the suburbs,” he said.

Chris Mygatt, president of Coldwell Banker Real Estate in Colorado, said that while the Case-Shiller report is a positive sign, he thinks the market is poised to recover even faster than its report shows.

“If you look at the MLS (Metrolist) data from January, it marked five consecutive months of average prices increasing in Denver,” Mygatt said. “That is in conjunction with the inventory down to 17,000, plus or minus, low interest rates, and the tax credits, we could be in store for a pretty decent rebound.”

Mygatt said he does not think there is much chance that the tax credits will be extended beyond their current expiration dates. But he thinks that will keep the government buying mortgage-backed securities to keep interest rates low.

Jeff Bernard, a broker with RE/MAX Alliance and principal of Bernard Real Estate Analytics, said his “hunch” is that San Francisco home prices rose so much is because wealthy foreigners took advantage of a weak dollar to buy houses there last year.

He said he thinks that Denver’s overall appreciation is probably caused by homes from $90,000 to $350,000, which have bounced from lower levels, which offset homes at the upper end that have been heavily discounted from their original prices. “I would imagine there would be a fairly large standard deviation if you broke the numbers down by price points,” Bernard said.

Still, Cochran said it is good news that home prices in Denver are moving in the right direction.

“Having a positive number is good, but certainly I have to look at it very, very cautiously as an indicator of where we are heading,” Cochran said.

Overall, the 10-City and 20-City Composites continued to show improvement in their annual rates of return. In fact, all 20 metro areas and the two composites saw improvement in their annual returns compared to November’s data. Only three cities – Detroit, Las Vegas and Tampa – still showed double digit annual rates of decline as of the end of 2009. Miami, Phoenix and Seattle all moved above such rates with December’s report.

But the areas did not fare as well from November to December. Denver lost 0.8 percent, compared to a loss of 0.2 percent for the 20 cities in the index. Only three cities – Chicago, Cleveland and Dallas – showed bigger month-t0-moth declines than Denver.

“As measured by prices, the housing market is definitely in better shape than it was this time last year, as the pace of deterioration has stabilized for now. However, the rate of improvement seen during the summer of 2009 has not been sustained,” says David M. Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at Standard & Poor’s. “In the most recent months we are seeing fewer and fewer MSAs reporting monthly gains in prices. Only four cities saw month to month improvements in December over November, when you look at the raw data. We are in a seasonally slow period for home prices, however, so it is not surprising to see better statistics in the seasonally-adjusted data, where 14 of the markets and the two monthly composites all rose in December. Similarly, the National Composite fell by 1.1% in the fourth quarter, but rose by 1.6% on a seasonally-adjusted basis.”

Metropolitan Area November-December Change 1-Year Change from December
Atlanta -0.7% -4.0%
Boston -0.1% 0.5%
Charlotte -0.7% -3.8%
Chicago -1.6% -7.2%
Cleveland -0.8% -1.2%
Dallas -0.9% 3.0%
DENVER -0.8% 1.2%
Detroit 0.0% -10.3%
Las Vegas 0.2% -20.6%
Los Angeles 1.0% 0.0%
Miami -0.3% -9.9%
Minneapolis -0.5% -2.3%
New York -0.7% -6.3%
Phoenix 0.5% -9.2%
Portland -0.3% -5.4%
San Diego 0.1% 2.7%
San Francisco -0.2% 4.8%
Seattle -0.7% -7.9%
Tampa -0.6% -11.0%
Washington, D.C. -0.2% 1.9%
Composite-10 -0.2% -2.4%
Composite-20 -0.2% -3.1%

Source: Standard & Poor’s, Fiserv

Contact John Rebchook at JRCHOOK@gmail.com or 303-945-6865.

Posted in Real Estate | No Comments »